Thursday 18 August 2022

Bhagavad Gita Summary Chapter 18: Moksha Sanyasayoga or The Yoga of Liberation and Renunciation 1/2

Chapter 18: Moksha Sanyasayoga or The Yoga of Liberation and Renunciation (78 verses)
The final chapter, the third to deal with the Gunas, is the longest, and perhaps aims to be a final summary, or recapitulation of sorts, returning again to the fundamental questions of action, knowledge, devotion, detachment and renunciation.
1- Renunciation (1-11)
Samnyasa ' and ' Tyaga ' distinguished. (1-2)
2. Sages understand ' samnyasa ' to be the renouncement of interested works ; the abandonment of the fruits of all works, the learned declare, is ' tyaga .
A few sages understand by ' samnyasa ' the abandonment of kamya-karmani, of works (such as the Asvamedha, Horse sacrifice ) acccompanied with a desire for fruits. The learned declare that ' tyaga ' means abandonment of the fruits of all the works that are performed, — nitya and naimittika, ordinary and extra-ordinary duties,—i.e., of the fruits that may accrue to the performer.  (Baghavad Gita, with the Commentary of Sri Sankaracharya, transl. A. Mahadeva Sastri, 1901)
Should the ignorant perform works or not? (3-4)
3. That action should be abandoned as an evil, some philosophers declare; while others (declare) that acts of sacrifice, gift and austerity should not be given up.
The Lord's decree is that the ignorant should perform works. (4-5)
Because it is hard to know the fact that the threefold (Tamasic, &c.) abandonment denoted by the words ' tyaga ' and 'samnyasa ' is possible in the case of him alone who does not know the Self and for whom works are intended,—not in the case of him who sees the Supreme Reality,—therefore no one, other than Myself, is able to teach the real truth about the subject. Wherefore, learn from Me what My—the Lord's—decree is as to the real teaching of the sastra.  (Baghavad Gita, with the Commentary of Sri Sankaracharya, transl. A. Mahadeva Sastri, 1901)
The obligatory works should be performed without attachment. (6)
Abandonment Some people consider these routine and incidental actions as useless because they must be done routinely anyway. But just as food gives satisfaction (to the taste-buds) and removes hunger, similarly these routine and incidental actions give all-round results. Performance of these routine and incidental actions removes the blemishes from one's mind, raises one's worth and because of it one reaches a good state in the after-world. But even though one gains such fruits of the routine and incidental actions, one should abandon those fruits. Thus, while one should attentively perform the routine and incidental duties keeping oneself within the prescribed bounds, the fruits thereof should be abandoned totally. This abandoning of the fruits of actions is called abandonment. Thus I have explained to you abandonment and Sanyas (renunciation). Renunciation When renunciation occurs the actions done with desire do not bother. Prohibited actions are not done because they are prohibited and the routine and incidental actions are automatically nullified because of the abandoning of their fruits. (Dnyaneshwari; 18:119-126).
Tamasic and Rajasic renunciations of works. (7)
7. Verily, the abandonment of an obligatory duty is not proper ; the abandonment thereof from ignorance is declared to be Tamasic.
8. Whatever act one may abandon because it is painful, from fear of bodily trouble, he practises Rajasic  abandonment, and he shall obtain no fruit whatever of abandonment.
Renunciation in works is Sattvic. (9)
9. Whatever obligatory work is done, O Arjuna, merely because it ought to be done, abandoning attachment and also the fruit, that abandonment is deemed to be Sattvic.
When the man who is qualified for (Karma- Yoga) performs obligatory works without attachment and without a longing for results, his inner sense (antah-karana), unsoiled by desire for results and regenerated by (the performance of) obligatory works, becomes pure. When pure and tranquil, the inner sense is fit for contemplation of the Self.  (Baghavad Gita, with the Commentary of Sri Sankaracharya, transl. A. Mahadeva Sastri, 1901)
From renunciation in works to renunciation of all works. (10)
10. He hates not evil action, nor is he attached to a good one,—he who has abandoned, pervaded by Sattva and possessed of wisdom, his doubts cut asunder.
Renunciation of fruits is alone possible for the ignorant. (11)
11. Verily, it is not possible for an embodied -being to abandon actions completely; he who abandons the fruits of actions is verily said to be an abandoner.
An embodied being: a body-wearer, i. e., he who identifies himself with the body. No man of discrimination can be called a body-wearer, for it has been pointed out (ii.21, etc.) that such a man does not concern himself (in actions) as their agent. So, the meaning is : it is not possible for an ignorant man to abandon actions completely. When an ignorant man who is qualified for action performs obligatory works, abandoning merely the desire for the fruits of his actions, he is said to be an abandoner (tyagin) though he is a performer of works. This—the title " abandoner,"—is applied to him for courtesy's sake. Accordingly, the abandonment of all actions is possible for him alone who, realising the Supreme Reality, is not a ' body-wearer,' i. e., does not regard the body as the Self. (Baghavad Gita, with the Commentary of Sri Sankaracharya, transl. A. Mahadeva Sastri, 1901)
2- The Five Causes (12-17)
Effects of the two renunciations after death. (12)
12. The threefold fruit of action,—evil, good, and mixed,—accrues after death to non-abandoners, but never to abandoners.
Factors in the production of an act. (13-15)
14. The seat and actor and the various organs, and the several functions of various sorts, and the Divinity also, the fifth among these;
The agency of the Self is an illusion. (16) Realisation of the non agency of the Self leads to absolution from the effects of all work. (17)
3- Knowledge, Mental Impuses (18-22)
The impulses to action. (18)
Knowledge, the object known, the knower (form) the threefold impulse to action ; the organ, the end, the agent, form the threefold basis of action.
If the knower likes the knowable sense-object then he cannot tolerate a moment's delay in enjoying it. But if he dislikes it then every moment of delay in abandoning it seems to him like aeons. Then he does actions in order to accept or reject it. Thus the knower becomes the doer of actions. He who, with the desire of sense pleasures, makes the organs work becomes the doer and then knowledge becomes the cause or in other words the means and consequently the knowable becomes the action. In this manner the basic nature of the knowledge changes. By giving impetus to the organs knower is caught in the ego of being the doer. (Dnyaneshwari; 18: 486-495, transl. M.R. Yardi)   
The Impulses are threefold according to the gunas. (19)
Sattvic Knowledge. (20)
Here follows the threefold character of knowledge :
20. That by which a man sees the one Indestructible Reality in all beings, inseparate in the separated,—that knowledge know thou as Sattvic.
Reality (Bhava): the one Self. Indestructible : which cannot be exhausted either in itself or in its properties ; Kutastha or immutable. All beings: from Avyakta, or the unmanifested matter, down to the sthavara or unmoving objects. That Reality, the Self, is not different in different bodies; like the akasa, the Self admits of no division. Know thou this direct and right perception of the non-dual Self as Sattvic. (Baghavad Gita, with the Commentary of Sri Sankaracharya, transl. A. Mahadeva Sastri, 1901)
Rajasic Knowledge. (21) 
The dualistic fallacious systems of philosophy are Rajasic and Tamasic, and therefore they cannot directly bring about the cessation of samsara. 
21. But that knowledge which, by differentiation, sees in all the creatures various entities of distinct kinds, that knowledge know thou as Rajasic. 
Tamasic Knowledge. (22) 
22. But that which clings to one single effect as if it were all, without reason, having no real object, and narrow, that is declared to be Tamasic. 
This knowledge is not founded on reason and does not perceive things as they are. Because it is not founded on reason, it is narrow, as extending over a limited area, or as producing very small results. This knowledge is said to  be Tamasic, because it is found only in Tamasic beings possessing no faculty of discrimination.  (Baghavad Gita, with the Commentary of Sri Sankaracharya, transl. A. Mahadeva Sastri, 1901)
4- Kinds of Action (23-28)
Sattvic Action. (23) Rajasic Action. (24) Tamasic Action. (25)
Sattvic Agent. (26) 
26. Free from attachment, not given to egotism, endued with firmness and vigour, unaffected in success and failure, an agent is said to be Sattvic. 
Rajasic Agent (27)Tamasic Agent (28) 
5- Kinds of Intellect (29-32)
Intellect and Firmness are threefold according to Gunas. (29) Sattvic Intellect. (30) 
30. That which knows action and inaction, what ought to be done and what ought not to be done, fear and absence of fear, bondage and liberation, that intellect is Sattvic, O Partha. 
Action (pravntti): the cause of bondage, the karmamarga, the path of action as taught in the sastra. Inaction (nivntti): the cause of liberation, the path of samnyasa. — As ' action ' ( pravritti ) and ' inaction ' (nivntti) occur in connection with ' bondage' (bandha) and ' liberation' (moksha), they have been interpreted to mean the paths of action and renunciation (karma and samnyasa).  (Baghavad Gita, with the Commentary of Sri Sankaracharya, transl. A. Mahadeva Sastri, 1901)
Rajasic Intellect. (31) Tamasic Intellect. (32) 
6- Kinds of Resistance (33-35)
Sattvic Firmness.  (33) 
33. The firmness which is ever accompanied by Yoga, and by which the activities of thought, of life-breaths and sense-organs, O Partha, are held fast, such a firmness is Sattvic. 
Sattvic fortitude When the Sattvic fortitude is created, the activities of the  mind, the life-force and the organs stop. Then the association of the ten organs with the sense-objects breaks and they enter the womb of the mind (i.e. instead of turning towards sense objects they turn inwards towards the mind). Since both the upper and the lower pathways of the life force are blocked it brings together its nine aspects and goes to the Sushumna Nadi. Since mind is freed of will and doubt it is exposed and the intellect rests quietly in its rear. Thus, the peerless fortitude which by stopping the activities of the mind, life-force and the organs imprisons them to the confines of meditation and keeps them so without getting lured by them until they are handed over to our emperor the Supreme Soul, is the Sattvic fortitude. (Dnyaneshwari; 18:737-744, transl. M.R. Yardi)   
Rajasic Firmness. (34) Tamasic Firmness. (35) Pleasure is threefold according to gunas. (36) 
7- Pleasure (37-39)
Sattvic Pleasure. (37)
37. That which is like poison at first, like nectar at the end, that pleasure is declared to be Sattvic, born of the purity of one's own mind. 
Sattvic bliss In order to achieve that bliss of the Self one has to suffer in the beginning itself the pains of observing the self-restraints, rules etc. When the strong detachment which swallows all the likes and dislikes develops it uproots the binding (liking) to the heaven and the world. The weakness of intellect etc. gets severely mutilated while listening to strict discretion and while observing strict austerities. Surge of the vital airs Prana and Apana are required to be swallowed through the Sushumna Nadi and all these efforts are required to be made in the beginning itself. The organs suffer and feel as if it is the end of the aeon while leaving the sense objects but with detachment these pains are to be faced with courage. Thus by suffering the pains in the beginning itself they achieve the highest kind of bliss. After the detachment gets matured by the knowledge of the Self, all sorrows originating in ignorance including the detachment vanish. Intellect becomes one with the Soul and the mine of non-duality automatically opens up for it. In this way, the bliss, which is rooted in detachment and ends in the peace of the Self-realisation, may be called Sattvic bliss. (Dnyaneshwari; 18:781-793, transl. M.R. Yardi)   
Rajasic Pleasure. (38)
38. That pleasure which arises from the contact of the sense-organ with the object, at first like nectar, in the end like poison, that is declared to be Rajasic. 
Tamasic Pleasure. (39) 

No comments:

Post a Comment