The early Theosophical works give some distinctive and quite detailed information on the reincarnation question.Here's a short overview by H.P. Blavatsky:
''Let
us try once more to explain our meaning. The reviewer speaks of the “Spiritual
Individuality” or the Immortal Monad as it is called, i.e., the seventh and
sixth Principles in the “Fragments.” In Isis we refer to the personality or the
finite astral monad, a compound of imponderable elements composed of the fifth
and fourth principles. The former as an emanation of the ONE absolute is
indestructible; the latter as an elementary compound is finite and doomed
sooner or later to destruction with the exception of the more spiritualized
portions of the fifth principle (the Manas or mind) which are assimilated by
the sixth principle when it follows the seventh to its “gestation state” to be
reborn or not reborn, as the case may be, in the Arupa Loka (the Formless
World). The seven principles, forming, so to say, a triad and a quaternary, or,
as some have it a “Compound Trinity,” subdivided into a triad and two duads,
may be better understood in the following groups of Principles:
GROUP I.
7. Atma— “Pure Spirit.” 6. Buddhi— “Spiritual Soul or Intelligence.” |
}
|
SPIRIT.
Spiritual Monad or “Individuality” — and its vehicle. Eternal and indestructible. |
GROUP II.
5. Manas— “Mind or Animal Soul.” 4. Kama-rupa— “Desire” or “Passion” Form. |
}
|
SOUL. Astral Monad—or the personal Ego and its vehicle. Survives Group III. and is destroyed after a time, unless reincarnated, as said, under exceptional circumstances. |
GROUP III.
3. Linga-śarira— “Astral or Vital Body.” 2. Jiva— “Life Principle.” 1. Sthula-śarira— “Body.” |
}
|
BODY .
Compound Physical, or the “Earthly Ego.” The three die together invariably. |
And
now we ask,—where is the “discrepancy” or contradiction? Whether man was good,
bad, or indifferent, Group II has to become either a “shell,” or be once or
several times more reincarnated under “exceptional circumstances.” There is a
mighty difference in our Occult doctrine between an impersonal Individuality,
and an individual Personality. C. C. M. will not be reincarnated; nor will he
in his next rebirth be C. C. M., but quite a new being, born of the thoughts
and deeds of C. C. M.: his own creation, the child and fruit of his present
life, the effect of the causes he is now producing. Shall we say then with the
Spiritists that C. C. M., the man we know, will be reborn again? No; but that
his divine Monad will be clothed thousands of times yet before the end of the
Grand Cycle, in various human forms, every one of them a new personality. Like
a mighty tree that clothes itself every spring with a new foliage, to see it
wither and die towards autumn, so the eternal Monad prevails through the series
of smaller cycles, ever the same, yet ever changing and putting on, at each
birth, a new garment. The bud, that failed to open one year, will reappear in
the next; the leaf that reached its maturity and died a natural death—can never
be reborn on the same tree again.''
Blavatsky Collected Writings Volume 4 Page 182
ISIS UNVEILED AND THE THEOSOPHIST ON REINCARNATION*
[The Theosophist, Vol. III, No. 11, August, 1882, pp. 288-289]
Blavatsky Collected Writings Volume 4 Page 182
ISIS UNVEILED AND THE THEOSOPHIST ON REINCARNATION*
[The Theosophist, Vol. III, No. 11, August, 1882, pp. 288-289]
No comments:
Post a Comment