Wednesday, 22 February 2017

Plato's Four Arguments for the Immortality of the Soul from the Phaedo part 1

1- Argument from Generation of Opposites (70b-72d)

Presented herein are the four arguments for the immortality of the soul from that classic work on reincarnation, Plato’s Phaedo.
Historical analysis has determined that Socrates’ associates in this dialogue are Pythagoreans, and so there is no need to argue for the belief in reincarnation as it is an accepted belief of Pythagoreanism. Moreover, one notices various allusions to Greek mystery religions, and so one can infer that this dialogue pertains to teachings related to the mysteries of initiation, making this dialogue a kind of philosophical mystery drama.
The first argument begins with the question: Do the souls of the departed exist in another world or not?
Accepting the Pythagorean account of reincarnation, the first premise proposed is:
“The living come into being again from the dead”
We can infer, therefore, that our souls exist in another world because if they did not come from the dead, they would not pre-exist.
And so the task at hand is to prove that the living come from the dead, that this is a necessary law.
To do this, a more general premise is presented:
Everything that is generated (plants, animals, humans) is generated from opposites; for example, when a thing becomes bigger it must have been smaller first.
This theory of opposites is a prevalent notion in Greek natural science; see, for example, Aristotle, Physics book 1. Further examples are given:

Smaller

Bigger

Weaker

Stronger

Faster

Slower

Worse

Better

Just

Unjust

Moreover, there are two processes of generation, the first to the second and the second to the first (back and forth and vice versa). For example:

Increasing

Decreasing

Separating

Combining

Cooling

Heating

Sleeping

Waking

Living

Dying

Hence, between each pair of opposites, there are two processes of generation.
We can then assume:
As sleeping and waking are generated opposites that have going to sleep and waking up as a process, so living and dying are generated opposites, the process being dying and coming to life.
And if this is so, then the souls of the dead exist in a place where they are to be reborn.
Furthermore, we can assume that the process of change from opposites must exist in a continuous cycle, or else things would remain static because if there was no waking up, we would always be asleep, and if there was no coming to life, then everything would die away.
One can then infer that since this process never ends, then the soul is immortal.

Part Two 

Friday, 10 February 2017

The Rose Garden (Gulistan) of Sa'di

Human beings are members of a whole,
In creation of one essence and soul.
If one member is afflicted with pain,
Other members uneasy will remain.
If you have no sympathy for human pain,
The name of human you cannot retain.

The above verse can be found in the entrance of the United Nations Hall of Nations: building. Known as Bani Adam, (the Children of Adam), it is from chapter 1, story 10 of "The Rose Garden"( Gulistan) of Sa'di (1210-1291), a Persian poet in 1258. (Rhyming translation by -M. Aryanpoor) Iranian poet Sa'adi, from the 13th century, is one of the major influential Persian poets of the medieval period. He is recognised in the literary world for the quality of his writing style and in the spiritual realm for the depth of his thoughts. The well-known saying “I cried because I had no shoes until I met a man who had no feet”, which was highly valued by Helen Keller, comes from Chapter 3, Story 19 of The Rose Garden.

His Rose Garden is said to be one of the widest read books of all time. It is wonderfully edifying poetic work full of short parables, verses and maxims, with a Sufi leaning. There are ten chapters:

I The Manners of Kings
II On the Morals of Dervishes
III On the Excellence of Content
IV On the Advantages of Silence
V On Love and Youth
VI On Weakness and Old Age
VII On the Effects of Education
VIII On Rules for Conduct in Life

Below is a translation from Sir Edwin Arnold:

The sons of Adam are limbs of each other
Having been created of one essence.
When the calamity of time afflicts one limb
The other limbs cannot remain at rest.
If thou hast no sympathy for the troubles of others
Thou art unworthy to be called by the name of a man.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/isl/gulistan.txt

This post dedicated to the victims of the Quebec City mosque shooting
http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/quebec-mosque-shooting-muslim-community-expresses-gratitude-for-outpouring-of-support 

Friday, 3 February 2017

Harvey Cox - The Market as God - 3rd Global Conference on World's Religions after September 11



Harvey Cox is the Hollis Research Professor of Divinity at Harvard Divinity School. The following is a paraphrase of a talk given on September 15, 2016 at the 3rd Global Conference on World's Religions after September 11. He has also published a book recently on the subjet:
http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674659681

His thesis is similar to concepts of Mircea Eliade who posits that even in a desacralized society, structures of the sacred do not disappear, they persist in more secular forms, so one can perceive mythical  and initiatic structures in novels and films, for example.


The Market as God – Consumer Capitalism as a Religious System

We live as a deified economy. Why are we all so gloomy? Why are we so self-obsessed? There is a global crisis. Consumer Capitalism is contributing to the destruction of our common home. This religion is not represented. Priests don’t admit it is a religion, but pronouncements are expected to be infallible such as ‘’the market will correct itself’’; yet the poor are still waiting.There is a market god with a market faith. There is an office of evangelisation. There are enormous efforts of penetration of market missionaries. It is a world faith with all the accoutrements of religion: a narrative, rituals, cathedrals (malls). There are prophets who look into future to invest funds. There is credulity, even if not producing what is promised, such as when poverty persists. If someone dies of hunger, there are no police to locate the culprit; when homeless person dies it is not news, but when the Dow (stock market) goes down, it’s news.Polemic debate was a fine art amongst all known religions but we are now in a post -polemical era between world religions. Where are the great skeptics such as Voltaire,who made fun of his religion. People turn to this destructive market Deity that causes despair and homelessness. We need a rebirth of historical critical thinking with polemics to deal objectively with religion.

The market God has become omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent. Monetary values have invaded all parts of our life. People pay their children to do the dishes. Students are viewed as customers and students thinks of themselves as consumers. Their used to be a sense of community. It is everywhere, it is extending its grip, it is relentless. It has us all in its thrall, but cannot make good on its promises. It’s omniscience is now under question. It is an incredible faith we are asked to subscribe to. It uses parables: commercials are mini-parables in three acts: 1- Illustrates consumers inadequacy; 2- Proposes some product; 3- The result is bliss. I went to Clifford Geerts anthropologist and his definition of religion is: system of symbols which acts to establish a persistent, pervasive and long lasting motivation in the form of a worldview that influences behavior in long run.

This market system has a narrative, symbols, rituals; it is a complete system with the objective to buy things. It’s about commodity, distribution and sales. I heard a confession of a businessman: “I spend all of my days trying to convince people to buy things they did not need”. It is a religion that persuades people to buy something that they don’t need. We all share the guilt for that. It is the escalation of one institution as the dominant force in our society. The market greatly exceeds its role, a dominant narrative is created. I am disappointed that people in theology don’t recognize this or gladly go along with it. This almighty God, all hearts open to him, all desire him who demands an impermanent fulfillment of needs. There is a cathedral in Milano; there is a mall whose design replicates the cathedral. Let us not ignore it, let us face honestly its threat because there is a globalization of indifference. Let us begin to train our critical thinking and our polemics at this threat. We have the right not to starve, and not to die of cold.

Saturday, 14 January 2017

Through the Gates of Gold 2 - Chapter 1 – Part 1 - The Truth of Suffering


This opening section is a kind of subtle updated formulation of the Buddhist Four Noble Truths (the questioning of the nature of sensation, pleasure and pain was prevalent in all of the ancient western schools of philosophy as well, from Socrates to Epicurus). We want to avoid the pains and miseries of life; but one cannot accomplish this by becoming indifferent and negating feeling and sensation. We crave life because of the sensations we experience. Therefore the key is to consider how to deal with this desire for sensation. And so there is proposed the path of the science of life:

”Would it not be a bolder policy, a more promising mode of solving the great enigma of existence, to grasp it, to take hold firmly and to demand of it the mystery of itself? If men will but pause and consider what lessons they have learned from pleasure and pain, much might be guessed of that strange thing which causes these effects. But men are prone to turn away hastily from self-study, or from any close analysis of human nature.”

”Yet there must be a science of life as intelligible as any of the methods of the schools. The science is unknown, it is true, and its existence is merely guessed, merely hinted at, by one or two of our more advanced thinkers. The development of a science is only the discovery of what is already in existence; and chemistry is as magical and incredible now to the ploughboy as the science of life is to the man of ordinary perceptions.”

”Yet there may be, and there must be, a seer who perceives the growth of the new knowledge as the earliest dabblers in the experiments of the laboratory saw the system of knowledge now attained evolving itself out of nature for man’s use and benefit.”


Some relevant passages from Light on the Path:


There are four proven and certain truths with regard to the entrance to occultism. The Gates of Gold bar that threshold; yet there are some who pass those gates and discover the sublime and illimitable beyond. In the far spaces of Time all will pass those gates. But I am one who wish that Time, the great deluder, were not so over-masterful. To those who know and love him I have no word to say; but to the others — and there are not so very few as some may fancy — to whom the passage of Time is as the stroke of a sledge-hammer, and the sense of Space like the bars of an iron cage, I will translate and re-translate until they understand fully. (Part 2, Comment 1)


No man desires to see that light which illumines the spaceless soul until pain and sorrow and despair have driven him away from the life of ordinary humanity. First he wears out pleasure; then he wears out pain — till, at last, his eyes become incapable of tears.
This is a truism, although I know perfectly well that it will meet with a vehement denial from many who are in sympathy with thoughts which spring from the inner life. To see with the astral sense of sight is a form of activity which it is difficult for us to understand immediately. The scientist knows very well what a miracle is achieved by each child that is born into the world, when it first conquers its eyesight and compels it to obey its brain. An equal miracle is performed with each sense certainly, but this ordering of sight is perhaps the most stupendous effort. Yet the child does it almost unconsciously, by force of the powerful heredity of habit. No one now is aware that he has ever done it at all; just as we cannot recollect the individual movements which enabled us to walk up a hill a year ago. This arises from the fact that we move and live and have our being in matter. Our knowledge of it has become intuitive. (Part 2, Comment 1)

Thursday, 5 January 2017

Blavatsky's translation of Leo Tolstoy's The Imp and the Crust (1889)

Here is an original translation from the Russian by Helena Blavatsky, done just three years after the original. Now known as The Imp and the Crust  (also translated as Promoting a Devil ), it is a short story by Leo Tolstoy first published in 1886. It is a cautionary tale against the dangers of alcohol. It later appeared in book form in English in 1906, translated by Aylmer and Louise Maude in Twenty-Three Tales. I think Blavatsky’s version is a little grittier, or crustier, if you will. Blavatsky sent Tolstoy an inscribed copy of her Voice of the Silence, which has survived, and his acknowledgement of  her correspondence is on record as well; he even used some passages for his Calendar of Wisdom / Pathway of Life (1912/1919 in English). She also translated Dostoevsky's The Grand Inquisitor from the Brothers Karamazov in the same year it was published, the first English translation of that great work.

“The moral lesson in "The Imp and the Crust" (1886) is a natural part of the story, in which the devil finally tricks the kind peasant into drunkenness. If Tolstoy's handling of this gem of a folk tale is regarded as a plea for temperance, it is a conclusion that must be drawn by the reader, for it is never explicitly stated in the text. Tolstoy's dramatization of the story, a comedy entitled 'The First Distiller' (1886), which will be considered in a later chapter, does turn out to be an amusing piece of forthright temperance propaganda.” ( from Introduction To Tolstoy's Writings -8. Later Short Stories- Ernest J Simmons (1968))

 For this number, however, we have selected one of a less mystical but more satirical spirit; a cap calculated to fit the head of any drinking Christian nation ad libitum, and we only hope its title, translated verbatim et literatim, will not shock still more the susceptibilities of the opponents of the title of this magazine. Russia is afflicted with the demon of drink, as much as, though not more than, England or any other country; yet it is not so much the Karma of the nation, as that of their respective governments, whose Karmic burden is growing heavier and more terrible with every year. This curse and universal incubus, drink, is the direct and legitimate progeny of the Rulers; it is begotten by their greed for money, and FORCED by them on the unfortunate masses. Why, in Karma’s name, should the latter be made to suffer here, and hereafter?

HOW A DEVIL’S IMP REDEEMED HIS LOAF; OR THE FIRST DISTILLER

A poor peasant went out early to plough; and as he was leaving home without breaking his fast, he carried along with him a loaf of bread. Once in the field he turned over his plough, adjusted the ploughtail, put the ropes under a bush, and over them his loaf of black bread, and covered the whole with his caftan. At last, the horse got tired and the moojik felt hungry. Then he stopped his plough in the furrow, unhitched his horse, and leaving it to graze, moved toward his caftan for his meal. But when he had lifted it up––lo, no loaf was to be seen.

Our moojik searched for it here, and he searched for it there he shook his garment and turned it hither and thither—no loaf! He felt surprised. Marvellous doings! No one around, and yet the loaf is carried away by someone. That someone, in truth, was an Imp, who, while the peasant was ploughing, had stolen his loaf and was now hiding behind a bush, preparing to note down the man’s profanity, when he would begin to swear and take the devil’s name. The peasant felt a little sore. “But, after all,” said he, “this won’t starve me; and he who carried away my bread, perchance needed it. Let him eat it then, and good luck to him.”

 So, going to the well he drank some water, rested a bit, then catching his horse, he hitched it again to the plough and returned quietly to his work. The Imp felt considerably troubled at such a failure in tempting man to sin and forthwith proceeding home to hell, he narrated to his Elder—the Chief Devil—how he had robbed the moojik of his loaf, who instead of cursing, had only said “to his good luck!” Satan felt very angry at this. “If,” he argued, “the moojik had the best of thee, in this business, then it must be thine own fault; thou didst not know how to bring the thing about. It would be a bad job for us,” he added, “if the peasants, and after them their women, were to take such tricks: no life would become possible for us after this, and such an event cannot be left disregarded. “Go,” continued Satan, “and make up for the failure of the loaf. And if at the end of three years thou shalt not have the best of that man, I will bathe thee in holy water.”

The Imp got terribly frightened at this threat, and running up to earth again, he set himself to thinking how to atone for his guilt. Thus he thought, thought still, and thought more, and went on thinking until he had found what he had to do. Assuming the appearance of a good fellow, he offered himself as a labourer to the poor peasant; and as it happened to be a drought, he advised him to sow his seed in a swamp. Hence, while the fields of all the other peasants were parched, and their harvests burnt by the sun, the crop of the poor peasant grew high and thick, full and grainy. His household had bread to their heart’s content up to the next harvest, and the surplus proved considerable. The following year, the summer being wet, the imp taught the peasant to sow his seed on the mountains. While his neighbours’ corn was blasted, fell down and got rotten, the peasant’s field on the hills brought forth the richest harvest. The moojik stored still more of the corn; and did not know what to do with it.

Then his labouring man taught him to press the corn and distill it into spirit. Having distilled plenty of it, the moojik took to drinking and making others drink thereof. One day the Imp returned to the Elder boasting that he had redeemed his loaf. The Chief went up to see for himself. Then came the Elder to the moojik, and found that having invited the richest and wealthiest of his neighbours, he was entertaining them with whiskey. There was the mistress carrying the glasses to her guests. Hardly had she begun her round when stumbling over the table, she upset the drink. Out at her flew the moojik abusing his wife to his fill.“Behold,” he cried, “the devil’s fool. Takest thou good drink for slops? Thou, heavy-handed stupid, to spill on the earth such treasure!”  Here the Imp poked the Elder in the ribs, “Observe,” said he, “and see, if he won’t grudge a loaf now.”

Having abused his wife, the moojik began offering the drink himself. Just then a poor labourer returning from work happened to drop in, unasked, and wishing a merry day to all, he took a seat. Seeing the company drinking, he too, craved to have a drop after his hard day’s work. There he sat, smacking his lips time after time, but the host would offer him nought, only keeping on grumbling: “Who can afford to furnish with whiskey all of you!”This pleased the chief Devil immensely; as to the Imp, he boasted more than ever: “You wait and see what will come next!” he whispered.

Thus drank the rich peasants, thus drank the host, pandering to each other, and flattering each other, with sweet words, making honeyed and false speeches. Listened the Elder to these, and praised the Imp for this, also. “Without all peradventure,” said he, “this drink making them turn into such foxes, they will take to cheating each other next; and at this rate they will soon fall, everyone of them, into our hands.”“Wait and see,” said the Imp, “what will come next, when each has one glass more. Now they are only like unto cunning foxes; given time, and they will get transformed into ferocious wolves.”

The peasants had each one glass more, and forthwith their talk became louder and more brutal. Instead of honeyed speeches, they proceeded to abuse each other, and turning gradually fiercer, they ended by getting into a free fight and damaging each other’s noses badly. Then the host took also a turn and got soundly thrashed. As the Elder looked on, he felt much pleased with this too. “ ‘Tis good,” saith he, “very, very good.” “Wait and see,” said the Imp, “something still better is in store, as soon as they will have emptied their third glass. Now they are fighting like hungry wolves, at the third glass they will have become like swine.”

The peasants had their third round, and quite lost their reason. Grumbling and hiccupping, shouting at each other, and knowing not what they said, they rushed out, some alone, some in couples, and some in triplets, and scattered in the streets. The host trying to see his guests off, fell with his nose in a mud-puddle, rolled in it and unable to rise, lay there grunting like a hog . . . . This pleased the Elder Devil most of all. “Well,” saith he, “thou hast invented a fine drink, indeed, and redeemed thy loaf! Tell me,” he added, “how hast thou managed to compound it? Surely thou must have fermented it first, with the blood  of the fox; thence the craft of the drunken peasant, who becomes forthwith a fox himself. Then thou hast distilled it with wolf’s blood, which makes him as wicked as a wolf? Finally, thou hast mixed the whole with the blood of the swine; therefore has the peasant become like a hog.”

“Not so,” quoth the Imp. “I only helped him to get some extra cereals. The wild beast’s blood is ever present in man, but it remains latent and finds no issue so long as he has no more bread then he needs for his food, and then it is that he does not grudge to another his last morsel of bread. But no sooner did man get more corn than he needed, than he took to inventing things wherewith to gratify his passions. Then it was that I taught him the enjoyment—of intoxicating drink. And no sooner had he commenced to distill the gift of God into spirit, for his gratification, than his original foxish, wolfish and swinish blood arose in him. Let him now only go on drinking wine and liquor, and he will remain for ever a beast.” For which invention the Elder Devil freely praised his Devil’s Imp, forgave him his failure with the stolen loaf, and promoted him in Hell.

Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 27, November, 1889. pp. 195-98

see also:
(Blavatsky's review of Tolstoi's lecture transcripts)
(Blavatsky's footnotes to an essay on Tolstoi's spiritual writings)
(Blavatsky's review of Tolstoy's Kreutzer Sonata)


Friday, 16 December 2016

Astrology: The Winter Solstice, Wednesday, December 21, 2016 5:44 am


Diplomatic Solutions 
Ancient Sacred Calendars gave a symbolic spiritual importance to equinoxes and solstices, those four dates forming four key moments in the year, a cross within a circle, symbolically. The Neoplatonic philosopher, Porphyry, in his eloquent essay “On the Homeric Caves of the Nymphs” explains that the tropic of Cancer  is related to Summer and the  Moon and is the North gate where the souls descend ; The tropic of Capricorn is related to Winter and Saturn, and is the South gate of ascent. Ascent is related to liberation; for example, the Roman Saturnalia festival is related to the Southern Tropic and features elements of divesting of garments, symbolising the return to pristine felicity, the fountain of life. 
The entrances are said be aligned with the North-South tropic rather than the East-West/Aries-Libra equinoctial axis because Sothis, the Dog-Star is near Cancer and related to the new moon, thus a symbol of generation. The word solstice is derived from the Latin sol (sun) and sistere (to stand still), because at the solstices, the Sun stands still in declination; that is, the seasonal movement of the Sun's path (as seen from Earth) comes to a stop before reversing direction. The winter solstice marks the shortest day and the longest night of the year and, following Ragon, it symbolizes the birth of the sun and thus coincides with the birth of Mithra with the Persians, the birth of Horus with the Egyptians, Dionysios in Grece, Adonis in Phoenicia, Attis in Phrygia, the Sol Invictis in Rome and the birth of Jesus Christ in Christianity.
Cardinal outer planet Pluto – Uranus - Jupiter T-Square
The general background for this year, is the  Cardinal outer planet Pluto – Uranus - Jupiter T-Square (which formed after the earlier Neptune-Jupiter-Saturn T-Square) with the Jupiter-Pluto square going  exact on November 24 and the Jupiter-Uranus opposition going exact on December 24, and can be considered the big configuration for 2017, in effect for the first nine months. (The T-square aspect pattern is formed when points in opposition also form a square with another point. The T-square is characterized by many obstacles that need to  be overcomed, along with the energy and drive to do so. The Cardinal quality is action and identity-oriented but with impulsivity that wastes energy.
This dynamic T-Square is characterized by a need for radical active change, (Uranus in Aries), rigid conservatism (Pluto in Capricorn) and open debate (Jupiter in Libra) which at best, can lead to, productive comprehensive reforms and at worst, to intense but chaotic and unproductive discussions and initiatives. Inner planet Mercury’s conjunction with Pluto intensifies the aspect of discussion and investigation of social problems and realities and the desire for revision and review of existing ideologies and systems. Note that Mercury went retrograde on December 19, which can add confusion, but also bring up underlying, lingering problems and past mistakes that need to be addressed.
Barry Perlman notes that: “Jupiter in Libra holds the promise of enhancing our capacity to weigh both sides of an equation, to advocate for fairness over domination, and to gracefully negotiate win-win solutions where all parties gain something while giving something else up. These are some of Libra's finest qualities, and Jupiter's presence there beckons us to invest greater enthusiasm and broad-sweeping vision in such approaches, as a counterbalance to both impetuous one-sided action in the name of unspecific 'change' (Uranus in Aries) and covert authoritarian dealings which seek to strengthen and secure existing status-quos by any means necessary (Pluto in Capricorn).”


Sun square Moon (in Libra)
We also have a Sun square Moon (in Libra) aspect which can heighten the expansive Jupiter/Uranus vocal ambitions for reforms. Mars opposite the North Node adds to the Uranian individualistic impetus for social protest against Plutonian repressiveness.
Venus-Uranus-Saturn/Sun and Saturn/Sun–Venus–Jupiter Minor Grand Trines
The two other major long-term aspects, Saturn’s trine to Uranus and sextile to Jupiter can help stabilize the volatile T-Square (the Saturn-Uranus trine goes exact on December 24) and for the solstice chart, Venus, and the Sun help form two minor grand trines superposed over the T-Square in a harmonious symmetry.   A grand trine is a planetary pattern composed of three or more planets in a chart located in Trine joined together to form an equilateral triangle.  The grand trine symbolizes earned, special advantages to be enjoyed in this life in the element common to the three planets. A minor Grand Trine, has only one trine, with two sextiles, meaning that the aspect requires more work for the aspects to be beneficial. They are occupying two fire signs (Aries, Sagittarius)  and two air signs (Libra, Aquarius)  Venus is in Aquarius and so allowing one another freedom of expression, and treating others fairly, unselfishly, and impartially, are some of the good qualities here.
The T-Square creates a strong drive for change, but with a volatile conflict between impulsive optimism (Uranian, Jupiterian) and conservative realism (Pluto). These Minor Grand Trine alignments are ideally positioned to give synergy to the T-Square, creating an opportunity where Venus and Saturn are collaborating to give the diplomacy and pragmatism needed to undertake some progressively productive comprehensive reform initiatives, thus taking some of the edge off of the volatile, confused quality of the T-Square.
Summary
It would seem that the next quarter, therefore, seems to be favored by the Uranian current of change, individualism and originality, which is benefitted by aspects giving better organization and diplomacy. There is a strong mood for discussion and dialogue of all sorts, with lots of power struggles created by resistance to innovation and polarized ideological, religious views and socio-cultural differences.
 In this age of dynamic information technology, there is a tendency to get lost in a sea of pointless discursiveness, ineffective bureaucratic procedures, and confused information. The winds of change can be positive and stimulating, albeit quite abrupt and difficult, but it would be good to watch for impulsiveness and make sure the planning and organization aspects are solid, the goals and objectives clear and realistic. It could be a favorable time for a re-organisation process built on more efficient methods and more informed ideals and values, ideally in an environment of productive discussion.
On a more mystical note, the geometrical harmony of the two Trines over the T-square form a kind of five-pointed star figure, with the apex at the Mercury/Pluto conjunction at mid-point in the very spiritual sign of Capricorn. Coincidently, the five-pointed star is closely related to the symbolism of Capricorn (see Blavatsky’s Secret Doctrine II, pp. 576-580).
“There is an earthly sun, which is the cause of all heat, and all who are able to see may see the sun; and those who are blind and cannot see him may feel his heat. There is an Eternal Sun, which is the source of all wisdom, and those whose spiritual senses have awakened to life will see that sun and be conscious of His existence; but those who have not attained spiritual consciousness may yet feel His power by an inner faculty which is called Intuition” (Paracelsus, De Fundamento Sapietiae, Hartmann, 145).
References:
Robert Pelletier, Planets in Aspect.
Robert Hand, Horosocope Symbols
Jean-Marie Ragon, La Messe et ses Mystères
 

Friday, 9 December 2016

Persian and Iranian Wisdom 2 - Sayings from the Javidan Khirad


1-The path of virtue lies in the renunciation of arrogance and pride.

2-Whoso clotheth himself in modesty will conceal his faults.

3-He who is not lowly in his own eyes will not be exalted in the eyes of others.

4-The man who knows not his own worth will never appreciate the worth of others.

5-Whosoever is ashamed of his father and mother, is excluded from Divine guidance.

6-Whosoever cannot forgive wrong done to him can never know the work of good that is done unto him.

7-The slightest provision against a quarrel is better than the stoutest persistence in carrying it on.

8- An easy temper is a good counsellor, and a pleasant tongue is an excellent leader.

9-Good advice to one who will not accept it, arms in the hands of one who knows not how to use them, and gold in the possession of one who benefits not mankind, are things wasted and lost.

10-He who takes advice is secure from falling; but whose is obstinate in his own opinion falleth into the pit of destruction.

11-In prosperity dread misfortune, for unto it thou must return; when anticipation is fairest, then think on tardy fate, for though he be slow yet is he sure.

12- In every blessing think upon its decay, in every misfortune think upon its removal. For such remembrance doth preserve blessing, and keep us from the intoxication of pride, and bringeth more real pleasure with it.